Above a specific book’s title in grandma’s bible is a one
sentence annotation of that books content. They probably helped or steered
Leona’s thinking as she studied each book. They also probably helped grandma
make connections between this books message with the grand story of the bible
(some use the million dollar word, meta-narrative
to describe this type of story). This condensation of content is very interesting
in some cases, and very common in others. A flip through these annotations
quickly reveal the hermeneutic, or
method of interpretation Leona used, both for the specific books content, and how the message fits with the grand
story of the bible. In each “biblical study” done this year I will begin with
Leona’s one sentence explanation to be the reference point for our study.
I begin with Ecclesiastes, not because it was grandma’s
favorite, but because it is my favorite. My knowledge of the book probably far
exceeds that of any other portion of the Bible, except for maybe Isaiah. I
don’t say that to brag, after all, who brags about a book which is typically a
“thorn in the side” for most Christians? I begin with Ecclesiastes because the
thought of even writing about what someone close to my family believed brings
fear, discomfort, and trepidation. Consider it a rather easy way to breach my
fears. Now how do I condense that knowledge into something not too long?
In our English Bible Ecclesiastes is located in the Old
Testament, in between Proverbs and Song of Songs. Its genre has been identified
as “Wisdom Literature.” Other complete books of “Wisdom Literature” include
Proverbs and Job. The English title comes from the Latin translation of the
Bible and is derived from the same word in Greek which means “church.” In the
King James Version the translators added the subtitle “Or, The Preacher.” This
subtitle is from the German translation which Martin Luther originally
translated the German as “The Preacher.” (stay with me!) Martin Luther was very
smart with this translation since the original Hebrew, Qoheleth, is best translated, not as a proper name, but as a title,
similar to the common phrase “I would like you to meet my preacher, pastor Richardson.” In its verbal form the Hebrew phrase
means “to assembly, to gather together.” NOW, let’s simply put all of these
words I’ve shotgun blasted you with together in a coherent sentence so you can
begin to see how I believe Leona thought through this book:
The church
is the true assembly, assembled together under the authority of the true preacher (that is, Jesus Christ,
Christ being his honored title).
To understand the significance of this idea, a very basic
understanding (to the point of perversity) of Ecclesiastes needs to be given,
although if you read it you won’t be worse off (Here is a link to the entire text). After the initial introduction
in 1:1, the main thesis statement or overture is made in 1:2, “Absurdity of
absurdities, says Qoheleth, absurdity of absurdities, all is absurdity.”
Ecclesiastes message is that life “under the sun,” that is, life here on earth,
is most often absurd. It is absurd because when we try to make heads or tails
of life’s “ultimate meaning” the hard metal slab separating those living “under
the sun” with he whom is living above the sun is most often barred, and we are locked
out. We only can live in “times” and “seasons” which are “beautiful in their
own time.” However, God has put an enigma in man’s heart because man cannot
find out what God is doing from beginning to end.” (3:11) Peter Kreeft, a
Catholic theologian and ethicist once wrote the he begins his introduction
theology classes with Ecclesiastes because it is the book which most often
connects with cynics, materialists, teenagers, and skeptics.
In grandma’s bible the word I’ve translated “absurdity” is commonly
rendered “vanity.” Even in a note in their Scofield Reference Bibles on the bottom
of the page reads,
““Vanity,” in Ecclesiastes, and usually
in scripture, means, not foolish pride, but the emptiness in final result of
all life apart from God….”
“Vanity/absurdity” occurs 38 times in Ecclesiastes. It
serves as the introduction phrase in 1:2 and the concluding phrase in 12:8.
Common to my grandparents was a belief held firmly about the nature of life “under
the sun,” a phrase that occurs 27 times in the book. For my spiritual legacy,
my family, and for the majority of church tradition, people have understood the
wisdom of Ecclesiastes to be of that “under the sun,” which is code for the
fleshly life, the earthly life, the sinful life, our condition rendered to us
by man’s rebellion as recorded in Genesis 3. In a very real since, this way of
understanding the book (foreign to how I was taught it) makes for this most interesting
observation: Ecclesiastes helps us understand how our rebellion and condition before
a just and holy God is connected with the gospel story. This story is the
recital of humanities own selfish grasp at salvation apart from God’s action
through the Cross of Jesus Christ. Paul in Romans calls this “living under the
law/living by the flesh” and theologians call this grasping for salvation with
our own strength “works based righteousness.” The author of Ecclesiastes (think
ultimately Jesus) called this living “under the sun.” In short, Ecclesiastes is
the summation of the entire Old Testament, a preparation for our redemption in
Israel’s Messiah – who Christians identify as Jesus.
My grandparents were great interpreters of the Bible, as
evidenced by their solidarity with about 1000 years of similar interpretations
from men and women throughout Christian tradition. Here is a quote from a great
set of books called “Ancient Christian Commentary on Scripture:
Ecclesiastes, “The Preacher,” also
understood as being Solomon, is a type of Christ (Didymus, Origen, Gregory of
Nyssa). In one sense, thought, the Spirit is the real author of this (Didymus).
In addition, the name Ecclesiastes indicates the church and the one who leads
it (Jerome, Gregory of Nyssa). The church is true knowledge, and Christ is the
author of that knowledge (Evagrius). The book of Ecclesiastes must be
understood spiritually and in light of other passages of scripture (Gregory of
Nyssa), for this present world is not the ultimate end (Evagrius). All things
are vanity, and we must turn away from them towards God (Ambrose, Augustine). All things are
vanity even though God made them good (Jerome).
J. Robert Wright, ed., Ancient Christian Commentary on Scripture.
Old Testament IX: Proverbs, Ecclesiastes, Song of Solomon (Downers Grove,
IL: InterVarsity Press, 2005), 190.
In Leona’s bible marginal phrases like “Emptiness in life
without God” and “money does not satisfy” are present in Leona’s bible; however
“other passages” of scripture (like Gregory of Nyssa said is necessary of
Ecclesiastes’ meaning) are referenced all over the place. Here is a rundown of
Leona’s cross references:
KJV Bible Passage Leona’s
marginal reference
1:2 Rom.
8:20-22
5:15 Job
1:21; Psalms 49:17, I Timothy 6:7
7:3 II
Corinthians 7:10
7:8 Proverbs 14:21
11:5 Job
1:21; Psalms 71:6; 139:13-14
My grandparents knew that life was not just about what’s in
front of us, that reason and logic has its limits, that balance rather than
over indulgence in anything was wise, that work and play were both advantageous,
etc. Those things were not difficult for them to realize. Those things were not
difficult for the author of Ecclesiastes to realize. But it took true insight,
that is, to be illuminated by the Holy Spirit to see the world for what it truly
is, dominated by sin and death, but now redeemed through the death and
resurrection of Christ. Christ is the hermeneutic which we interpret the world through.
Long before I came to realize this, and long after I should have realized this
(after seminary), my grandparents were frolicking in this field with joy and
delight, eating, drinking, and being merry – for Christ lives and reigns.

Eric,
ReplyDeleteYou so aptly use words that connect what your grandparents said about Scripture and the truth of Scripture.
You can understand why I grew up with a profound respect for the authenticity of God's Word.
I liked your description of what it must be like in Heaven for your grandparents!
Lois
Lois,
DeleteI don't think I mentioned heaven anywhere in this post, except maybe in an inference which could be made about Qoheleth's view that life "above the sun" is barred from our knowledge.
I would say that most people would hold to a paradox, that is, we believe that Christ has lifted the veil of the old covenant, and shown us the wondrous light and beauty of Christ our redeemer in the New. But I DON'T think we can reduce this belief held by my grandparents and most of church history and tradition to a simple illustration which is:
Old Testament = life under the sun = the law and
New Testament = life above the sun = grace.
After all Paul balances this in Romans 7 and 8 by saying in Romans 7:14-20:
"We know that the law is spiritual; but I am unspiritual, sold as a slave to sin. 15 I do not understand what I do. For what I want to do I do not do, but what I hate I do. 16 And if I do what I do not want to do, I agree that the law is good. 17 As it is, it is no longer I myself who do it, but it is sin living in me. 18 For I know that good itself does not dwell in me, that is, in my sinful nature.[c] For I have the desire to do what is good, but I cannot carry it out. 19 For I do not do the good I want to do, but the evil I do not want to do—this I keep on doing. 20 Now if I do what I do not want to do, it is no longer I who do it, but it is sin living in me that does it."
I think my grandparents would still believe we live "under the sun" and that life is something in which we struggle with our whole life even during the process of sanctification. If we had an "above the sun" perspective would we be God then? Rather, Christians have proclaimed since its inception that God has come to us in the incarnation and made his dwelling with us (John 1). It is all God's doing. We have been given a glimpse of life above the sun through the incarnation of God as a baby, as a human. But I don't think that lifts us creatures to the position of creator.